From 74a3d46f64ecf527b6ee9b4b0fdfdb8ccc9bfa44 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: jaseg <git@jaseg.de>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2022 12:03:16 +0200
Subject: Make TAPS happy

---
 paper/safety-reset-paper.tex | 33 ++++++++-------------------------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)

(limited to 'paper/safety-reset-paper.tex')

diff --git a/paper/safety-reset-paper.tex b/paper/safety-reset-paper.tex
index f4e4633..4015f46 100644
--- a/paper/safety-reset-paper.tex
+++ b/paper/safety-reset-paper.tex
@@ -16,9 +16,6 @@
 
 % https://eepublicdownloads.entsoe.eu/clean-documents/pre2015/publications/entsoe/Operation_Handbook/Policy_1_Appendix%20_final.pdf
 
-%\keywords{Security, privacy and resilience in critical infrastructures \and Security and privacy in ``internet of
-%things'' \and Cyber-physical systems \and Hardware security \and Network Security \and Energy systems \and Signal theory}
-
 \copyrightyear{2022}
 \acmYear{2022}
 \setcopyright{rightsretained}
@@ -40,6 +37,8 @@ Conference}{December 5--9}{Austin, TX, USA}
 \affiliation{
   \institution{Technische Universität Darmstadt}
   \city{Darmstadt}
+	cp ../safety-reset-paper.pdf pdf/
+	cp ../safety-reset-paper.pdf pdf/
   \country{Germany}
 }
 \email{research@jaseg.de}
@@ -89,29 +88,15 @@ Conference}{December 5--9}{Austin, TX, USA}
 <concept_significance>300</concept_significance>
 </concept>
 <concept>
-<concept_id>10002978.10002997.10002998</concept_id>
-<concept_desc>Security and privacy~Malware and its mitigation</concept_desc>
-<concept_significance>300</concept_significance>
-</concept>
-<concept>
 <concept_id>10002978.10003001.10003003</concept_id>
 <concept_desc>Security and privacy~Embedded systems security</concept_desc>
 <concept_significance>500</concept_significance>
 </concept>
-<concept>
-<concept_id>10002978.10003001.10003599.10011621</concept_id>
-<concept_desc>Security and privacy~Hardware-based security protocols</concept_desc>
-<concept_significance>300</concept_significance>
-</concept>
 </ccs2012>
 \end{CCSXML}
 
-\ccsdesc[500]{Hardware~Power networks}
-\ccsdesc[300]{Hardware~Smart grid}
-\ccsdesc[500]{Hardware~Safety critical systems}
-\ccsdesc[300]{Security and privacy~Malware and its mitigation}
-\ccsdesc[500]{Security and privacy~Embedded systems security}
-\ccsdesc[300]{Security and privacy~Hardware-based security protocols}
+\keywords{Grid Frequency Modulation, Direct Sequence Spread Spectrum, Incident Response, Cyber-Physical Systems, Power
+Networks, Smart Grid, Embedded Systems Security}
 
 \begin{abstract}
     The growing heterogenous ecosystem of networked consumer devices such as smart meters or IoT-connected appliances
@@ -556,7 +541,7 @@ measurement literature~\cite{borkowski01}.
 
 \begin{figure}
     \centering
-    \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{../notebooks/fig_out/freq_meas_spectrum_new}
+    \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{freq_meas_spectrum_new}
     \caption{The spectrum of grid frequency variations measured over 24 hours. The raw spectrum is shown in gray, and a
     smoothed spectrum is shown in red. The blue line is inversely proportional to frequency and illustrates the $1/f$
     nature of the spectrum. Distinctive peaks in the spectrum are marked with red crosses, and their locations
@@ -706,7 +691,7 @@ durations move our signals' bandwidth into the lower-noise region from $\SI{0.2}
 
 \begin{figure}
     \centering
-    \includegraphics[width=0.3\textwidth]{../notebooks/fig_out/dsss_gold_nbits_overview}
+    \includegraphics[width=0.3\textwidth]{dsss_gold_nbits_overview}
     \caption{Symbol Error Rate as a function of modulation amplitude for Gold sequences of several lengths.}
     \Description{A plot of symbol error rate versus amplitude in millihertz. The plot shows four lines, one each for 5
     bit, 6 bit, 7 bit and 8 bit. All four lines form smooth step functions, plateauing at a symbol error rate of 1.0 for
@@ -721,8 +706,7 @@ durations move our signals' bandwidth into the lower-noise region from $\SI{0.2}
 
 \begin{figure}
     \centering
-    \hspace*{-5mm}\includegraphics[width=0.5\textwidth]{../notebooks/fig_out/dsss_thf_amplitude_5678}
-    \vspace*{-5mm}
+    \hspace*{-5mm}\includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{dsss_thf_amplitude_5678}
     \caption{SER vs.\ Amplitude and detection threshold. Detection threshold is set as a factor of background noise
     level.}
     \Description{This figure shows four plots that are similar to the previous figure. Each plot shows symbol error rate
@@ -743,8 +727,7 @@ durations move our signals' bandwidth into the lower-noise region from $\SI{0.2}
 
 \begin{figure}
     \centering
-    \hspace*{-5mm}\includegraphics[width=0.5\textwidth]{../notebooks/fig_out/chip_duration_sensitivity_6}
-    \vspace*{-5mm}
+    \hspace*{-5mm}\includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{chip_duration_sensitivity_6}
     \caption{SER vs.\ DSSS chip duration.}
     \Description{The figure shows two plots. The first plot shows symbol error rate against signal amplitude in
     millihertz, but this time it shows a cohort of curves for different chip durations. The general amplitude behavior
-- 
cgit 

