diff options
| author | jaseg <git-bigdata-wsl-arch@jaseg.de> | 2020-07-05 13:10:34 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | jaseg <git-bigdata-wsl-arch@jaseg.de> | 2020-07-05 13:10:34 +0200 |
| commit | 01f7fd6e6d500ec577daa482f4e544416cc779ae (patch) | |
| tree | a2183701f8c2fb5cfe9d940120fe8bd278247b86 /ma | |
| parent | 5d2f3abe8189bba4ec348863074484aef701fe40 (diff) | |
| download | master-thesis-01f7fd6e6d500ec577daa482f4e544416cc779ae.tar.gz master-thesis-01f7fd6e6d500ec577daa482f4e544416cc779ae.tar.bz2 master-thesis-01f7fd6e6d500ec577daa482f4e544416cc779ae.zip | |
ma: soften the burny paragraph
Diffstat (limited to 'ma')
| -rw-r--r-- | ma/safety_reset.tex | 15 |
1 files changed, 7 insertions, 8 deletions
diff --git a/ma/safety_reset.tex b/ma/safety_reset.tex index 5065ccd..1c1576c 100644 --- a/ma/safety_reset.tex +++ b/ma/safety_reset.tex @@ -463,14 +463,13 @@ ubiquitous promises of energy savings depends on consumer coöperation. Here, th question smart metering's chances of long-term success. As \cite{pierce01} pointed out smart metering developments could benefit greatly from early involvement of HCI research. -HCI research certainly would not have overlooked entire central issues such as privacy as it happened in the dutch -case\cite{cuijpers01}. The current corporate-driven approach to a technological advance forced through national -standardization bears a risk of failing to meet its ostensible objectives for consumers. The role of consumers and the -complex socio-technological environment posed by this new technology is not seriously considered in the standardization -process. While certainly no one will admit to outright ignoring consumers in smart meter standardization, their role is -largely limited to the occasional public consultation. At the same time the standards are written by technologists--it -seems largely without input on their practicality or socio-technological implications from fields such as HCI. -% TODO citation? too much burn? +A systematic analysis of non-technical aspects can prevent issues such as privacy implications initially being +overlooked in the dutch deployment\cite{cuijpers01}. It is not clear that current standardization practice encompasses +an in-depth consideration of the role of consumers in the socio-technological environment posed by this new technology. +Standardization is often narrowly focused on technological aspects with little input beyond the occassional public +consultation at the time the new standards are being implemented into law. This corporate-driven approach to +technological progress being forced through national standardization bears a risk of failing to meet its advertised +consumer benefits. \subsection{Common components} \label{sm-cpu} |