diff options
-rw-r--r-- | pics/vec_contours_composited.png | bin | 40471 -> 40471 bytes | |||
-rw-r--r-- | pics/vec_hexgrid_composited.png | bin | 212917 -> 209066 bytes | |||
-rw-r--r-- | pics/vec_poisson_composited.png | bin | 308380 -> 308164 bytes | |||
-rw-r--r-- | pics/vec_square_composited.png | bin | 176841 -> 175781 bytes | |||
-rw-r--r-- | post.html | 256 |
5 files changed, 256 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/pics/vec_contours_composited.png b/pics/vec_contours_composited.png Binary files differindex ed0f3c9..34850f1 100644 --- a/pics/vec_contours_composited.png +++ b/pics/vec_contours_composited.png diff --git a/pics/vec_hexgrid_composited.png b/pics/vec_hexgrid_composited.png Binary files differindex 4923fc8..19976a0 100644 --- a/pics/vec_hexgrid_composited.png +++ b/pics/vec_hexgrid_composited.png diff --git a/pics/vec_poisson_composited.png b/pics/vec_poisson_composited.png Binary files differindex 73d313e..c1b59aa 100644 --- a/pics/vec_poisson_composited.png +++ b/pics/vec_poisson_composited.png diff --git a/pics/vec_square_composited.png b/pics/vec_square_composited.png Binary files differindex c02c2e8..b607454 100644 --- a/pics/vec_square_composited.png +++ b/pics/vec_square_composited.png diff --git a/post.html b/post.html new file mode 100644 index 0000000..4912651 --- /dev/null +++ b/post.html @@ -0,0 +1,256 @@ +<!doctype html> <html> + <head> + <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"> + <title>Create beautiful boards with Gerbolyze</title> +<style type="text/css"> +@font-face { + font-family: "playfair display webfont"; + font-weight: 600; + src: url("fonts/playfair-display-v22-latin-ext_latin-600.woff2") format("woff2"); +} + +@font-face { + font-family: "playfair display webfont"; + font-weight: 400; + src: url("fonts/playfair-display-v22-latin-ext_latin-regular.woff2") format("woff2"); +} + +@font-face { + font-family: "playfair display webfont"; + font-weight: 700; + src: url("fonts/playfair-display-v22-latin-ext_latin-700.woff2") format("woff2"); +} + +:root { + --textw: calc(min(600px, 100vw)); + --mar: calc(50vw - 0.5*var(--textw)); +} + +html, body { + margin: 0; + padding: 0; + hyphens: auto; + overflow-wrap: break-word; + font-size: 14pt; + font-family: "Source Sans Pro"; +} + +.content { + padding-left: 10px; + padding-right: 10px; + width: 100%; + box-sizing: border-box; +} + +/* +* { border: 1px solid red; } +*/ + +figure { + overflow: hidden; + padding-top: 20px; + padding-right: 0; + padding-bottom: 20px; + padding-left: var(--mar); + margin: 0; + box-sizing: border-box; + width: 100vw; + max-width: 100%; +} + +img { + display: inline-block; + width: var(--textw); + margin-right: 2em; +} + +figcaption { + display: inline-block; + margin: 0; + width: 20em; + vertical-align: top; + text-align: justify; +} + +figcaption > strong { + display: block; + font-family: "playfair display webfont"; + font-weight: 700; + color: #c00; + font-size: 16pt; + margin-bottom: .5em; +} + +.content > p { + margin-left: var(--mar); + width: var(--textw); + box-sizing: border-box; + text-align: justify; + line-height: 1.5; + max-width: 100%; +} + +h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6 { + font-family: "playfair display webfont"; + font-weight: 600; + color: #c00; + text-align: right; + margin: 0; + padding-left: 1em; + padding-top: 0; + box-sizing: border-box; + width: calc(var(--mar) + var(--textw)); + max-width: 100%; +} + +h1 { + font-size: calc(24pt + 2vh + 2vw); + padding-bottom: 0.7em; +} + +body::before { + content: ""; + display: block; + margin-top: 100px; + border-top: 0.7mm dashed #c00; + width: 100vw; + max-width: 100%; +} + +h2 { + font-size: calc(24pt + 1vh + 1vw); + margin-top: 1em; + margin-bottom: .5em; +} + +</style> + </head> + <body lang="en"> + <div class="content"> + <h1>Create beautiful boards with Gerbolyze</h1> + <p> + Today, there is an increasingly large crowd of people who do artistic circuit board designs. People who fuse + the roles of engineer and artist. Unitl today, circuit board design tools mostly ignore this use case and + present a multitude of obstacles for such use. Gerbolyze finally solves this problem and presents an + integrated solution for artistic PCB design that is compatible with real designer's workflows on one side + and with real electronic design automation software on the other side. + </p> + <figure> + <a href="pics/pcbway_sample_02_small.jpg"><img src="pics/pcbway_sample_02_small.jpg" alt="A printed + circuit board showing a surrealist manga-style drawing of a woman sitting atop several traffic + lights. The woman's hair looks golden from the circuit board's gold copper finish. The + background is blue and white with scales of gray emulated through a halftone technique like it + is used in newspapers."/></a> + <figcaption> + <strong>An artistic PCB design</strong> + <p> + This design was created from a digital artwork in a raster image file after circuit board + manufacturer PCBWay offered me some free boards. The artwork was pre-processed using a raster + graphics tool: It was split into layers for the different colors. Then, its color components were + adjusted for brightness and contrast and finally passed through a raster-based halftone filter. The + resulting file was then converted into circuit board manufacturing files using Gerbolyze. + </p> + </figcaption> + </figure> + <p> + Thirty years ago, the world of printed circuit board design was revolutionized by the introduction of + computer aided design tools. These tools enabled extremely complex designs through automation features + like autorouting and through automatic design rule checking to weed out human error. While the first + such tools were still very limited, their capabilites quickly grew and a few years after their + introduction modern electronics design without computers was already unthinkable. + </p> + <p> + Today, circuit board design programs can look back on a rich history and have accumulated a healty + amount of expert knowledge in their design. Despite their difficult economic niche, even <em>free + software</em> design tools have grown to become usable for advanced designs. However, all modern + circuit board design tools are severely lacking in one area: That of <em>artistic</em> design. Many + design assumptions are hard-wired deep into their design: Traces should be at 45° angles. Silkscreen is + one opaque color. etc. These design assumptions lead to these tools being <em>in the way</em> more often + than not for the increasing crowd of designers who try to create art with them. + </p> + <p> + Gerbolyze solves this problem. Gerbolyze interfaces with circuit board design tools such as Altium or Kicad + on one side through standard Gerber files. It interfaces with vector graphics editors such as inkscape on + the other side through Scaleable Vector Graphics (SVG) files. By fusing both, it yields a powerful + environment for artistic circuit board design. + </p> + <h2>Gerbolyze Algorithm Overview</h2> + <p> + Gerbolyze has two major components. The first is the gerbolyze executable itself, which orchestrates the + process of fusing SVG and Gerber files. The second is svg-flatten, a tool encapsulating all of the + heavy-duty computer graphics code. The gerbolyze executable is a python script for readability, while the + geometry backend is a C++ binary for performance. + </p> + <p> + In the beginning of the fusing process, the orchestrator figures out what semantic layers such as silkscreen + or copper the tool's input files correspond to. The assigned layers are then processed one by one. For each + layer, the tool first checks the input SVG file for any content. If there is none on this layer, the layer + file is directly copied to the output. If ther is some, this SVG content is passed through the geometry + backend to convert it to Gerber code. The resulting Gerber code is then read and added on top of the input + file's gerber code. The result is written to the output. + </p> + <h2>The Computer Geometry of Scaleable Vector Graphics</h2> + <p> + The heavy lifting during this process is done by the geometry backend. While its job seems simple at first, + it is surprisingly stretching the state of the art in both academic research and technical implementations + of computer graphics. In its core the problem is that while SVG and Gerber are both essentially vector + graphics formats, both have very different conceptions of their drawing models: They differ significantly in + what happens when one of the input file's vectors is drawn. + </p> + <p> + SVG is little more than a highly standardized description of the basic operations provided by the modern 2D + graphics interfaces such as Qt, Cairo or Skia that are built-in to all operating systems. Drawing + <em>paths</em> that are described by the vector coördinates of points along them is the most basic of these + operations. SVG also includes support for a surprising number of decidedly <em>raster</em> operations such + as masking but, operating on grayscales, these are less relevant for the type of design one would create + when targeting circuit board production processes. + </p> + <p> + Similar to SVG, the Gerber file format also targets a type of graphics programming interface. Only instead + of that of operating systems 2D graphics APIs of the 90ies and 2000s, the Gerber format was created as a way + to encapsulate commands for photoplotters, computer-controlled machines that physically move a light source + across a photo-sensitive material. Gerber's concept of "aptertures" goes back to mechanical photoplotters + having magazines of stencils of different shapes and sizes that could be swapped into the path of light + during the plotting process. + </p> + <p> + Like SVG has its paths, the Gerber format has polygons. Polygons were added to the format to ease the + description of irregularly-shaped areas: Previously, these would have to be drawn by overlaying thousands of + thin lines, described one by one in the Gerber file. Using a Polygon, one only needs to describe the shape's + outline as a series of points and the photoplotter will fill in the rest. + </p> + <h2>Transforming Vectors into Vectors</h2> + <p> + The crux in converting from SVG to Gerber lies here, in the conversion of paths. While in both a path or + polygon is described by its outline, which is described by points, there are significant differences in the + limitations both place on these outlines. In SVG an outline can consist of several types of segments: + besides basic straight lines, multiple types of parametrized curves including cubic bezier curves are + possible. An SVG path's outline can self-intersect (cross over itself). The path can also have holes, + additional parts that are inside the outline. + </p> + <p> + Gerber, on the other hand, has a much more limited view of what a polygon is. In gerber, a polygon is + something bounded by straight line segments, that cannot touch except under very particular circumstances, + and holes are simply not supported. Converting from SVG's flexible model of a path to Gerber's very + limited model of a polygon while preserving the fidelity of the input data is the true challenge here. As an + aside, a fun complication one will encounter when embarking on this endeavour is that most programs that + display Gerber files use modern graphics libraries in the backend. In these programs, a valid SVG path + ineptly converted into an illegal gerber polygon may still end up looking alright since these programs + usually just pass through the gerber's input data to the underlying graphics layer without validation—and + that graphics layer is the one from SVG. + </p> + <h2>Styles and Strokes</h2> + <p> + </p> + <!-- stroking --> + <h2>Gerbolyze Image Vectorization</h2> + <figure> + <a href="pics/vec-comparison-poisson.png"><img src="pics/vec-comparison-poisson.png"/></a> + <figcaption> + <strong>Poisson-Disc Sampling</strong> +<!-- ... --> + </figcaption> + </figure> + </div> + </body> +</html> |